<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tamron 17-50 VC Small Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/</link>
	<description>Learn easy Photoshop tips for your digital photographs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:14:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Issac Favorite</title>
		<link>http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/comment-page-1/#comment-18108</link>
		<dc:creator>Issac Favorite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 01:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoshopphotography.com/?p=300#comment-18108</guid>
		<description>Cool post!  I&#039;m still kind of new to the whole blog thing, but I&#039;ll definitely bookmark your page and check back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool post!  I&#8217;m still kind of new to the whole blog thing, but I&#8217;ll definitely bookmark your page and check back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3823</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoshopphotography.com/?p=300#comment-3823</guid>
		<description>Definitely, it&#039;s worth for your 1000d.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely, it&#8217;s worth for your 1000d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3808</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoshopphotography.com/?p=300#comment-3808</guid>
		<description>Hi Admin, I need your opinion. I&#039;m only using 1000d for camera body, do you think it is worth for me to upgrade from kit lens 18-55mm to this Tamron? or should I bought a new body fist (500D/550D with 18-55mm lens kit) considering similar budget will be spent. I only care the quality picture not the feature for recording movie and I don&#039;t need super big image resolution.

or in simple. which one will give me better picture quality:
1000D + Tamron 17-50 2.8 VC or 500d/550d + 18-55 lens kit?

Thank you in advance ^ ^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Admin, I need your opinion. I&#8217;m only using 1000d for camera body, do you think it is worth for me to upgrade from kit lens 18-55mm to this Tamron? or should I bought a new body fist (500D/550D with 18-55mm lens kit) considering similar budget will be spent. I only care the quality picture not the feature for recording movie and I don&#8217;t need super big image resolution.</p>
<p>or in simple. which one will give me better picture quality:<br />
1000D + Tamron 17-50 2.8 VC or 500d/550d + 18-55 lens kit?</p>
<p>Thank you in advance ^ ^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One god</title>
		<link>http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3667</link>
		<dc:creator>One god</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 07:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoshopphotography.com/?p=300#comment-3667</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;...&lt;/strong&gt;

As usual this was a thoughtful publish these days. You make me wish to retain coming back again and forwarding it my followers…....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>As usual this was a thoughtful publish these days. You make me wish to retain coming back again and forwarding it my followers…&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Bilcliff</title>
		<link>http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3312</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Bilcliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoshopphotography.com/?p=300#comment-3312</guid>
		<description>As soon as this lens is available for the Sony Alpha 850 I will be investing in it. Thank you for the work you put in to show off this lens. very informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As soon as this lens is available for the Sony Alpha 850 I will be investing in it. Thank you for the work you put in to show off this lens. very informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2977</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 00:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoshopphotography.com/?p=300#comment-2977</guid>
		<description>Hi Admin, sorry for asking a difficult question, anyway i have sold my Canon 17-85mm and bought the Tamron 17-50mm VC version. The Tamron is really good and i love it.

Cheers,
Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Admin, sorry for asking a difficult question, anyway i have sold my Canon 17-85mm and bought the Tamron 17-50mm VC version. The Tamron is really good and i love it.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1218</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoshopphotography.com/?p=300#comment-1218</guid>
		<description>Hi Admin,
I have the Canon 17-85 IS, and also the Sigma 50mm 1.4. after reading your review, i was thinking of changing my canon 17-85mm f4-5.6 to the Tamron VC version as it&#039;s a faster lens. do you think i should changing to the Tamron? i&#039;m using Canon 450d by the way.

Many thanks,
Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Admin,<br />
I have the Canon 17-85 IS, and also the Sigma 50mm 1.4. after reading your review, i was thinking of changing my canon 17-85mm f4-5.6 to the Tamron VC version as it&#8217;s a faster lens. do you think i should changing to the Tamron? i&#8217;m using Canon 450d by the way.</p>
<p>Many thanks,<br />
Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/comment-page-1/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoshopphotography.com/?p=300#comment-791</guid>
		<description>Yes. That&#039;s right. It&#039;s worth for buying this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. That&#8217;s right. It&#8217;s worth for buying this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HD</title>
		<link>http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/comment-page-1/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>HD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoshopphotography.com/?p=300#comment-790</guid>
		<description>Image stabilization, silent focus, F2.8 and 17mm for only ~$700. Sounds good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Image stabilization, silent focus, F2.8 and 17mm for only ~$700. Sounds good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoshopphotography.com/?p=300#comment-532</guid>
		<description>After being (again) a few days in service, they&#039;ve changed again my lens. The new one has no problems with the VC on any conditions. 
All in all, the tamron CAN be a very good choice, but unfortunately you must be willing (and possible) to change 1-2-3 times the lens until you got a good copy.
best regards,
Adrian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After being (again) a few days in service, they&#8217;ve changed again my lens. The new one has no problems with the VC on any conditions.<br />
All in all, the tamron CAN be a very good choice, but unfortunately you must be willing (and possible) to change 1-2-3 times the lens until you got a good copy.<br />
best regards,<br />
Adrian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.photoshopphotography.com @ 2012-02-07 11:24:59 -->
