<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Photoshop for Digital Photographers &#187; Tamron 17-50 VC Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tag/tamron-17-50-vc-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photoshopphotography.com</link>
	<description>Learn easy Photoshop tips for your digital photographs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 06:52:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tamron 17-50 VC Small Review</title>
		<link>http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamron 17-50 VC Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoshopphotography.com/?p=300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is not a Photoshop article but I think that it&#8217;s still good to share some photographic equipment with you that I have experience with. Lens is one of the most important parts of photographic gear so I wish this article with help you would help you find a good lens. When I heard about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>This is not a Photoshop article but I think that it&#8217;s still good to share some photographic equipment with you that I have experience with. Lens is one of the most important parts of photographic gear so I wish this article with help you would help you find a good lens.</p>
<p>When I heard about new lens from Tamron, <strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><a href="http://amzn.to/ntbtRB" rel="nofollow">Tamron 17-50 F2.8 VC</a></span></strong>, I thought that this version must have some improvement over the current version, <strong><a href="http://amzn.to/o5GwzX" rel="nofollow">Tamron 17-50 F2.8</a> </strong>which I often use for most of my shots. My friend,<a href="http://lkunl.multiply.com"> Kun</a>, and I went to camera shop in Bangkok, named AV camera, had chance to test new lens from Tamron, Tamron 17-50 F2.8 VC. Initially, I would like to test this lens with <a title="canon dslr" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fs%3Furl%3Dsearch-alias%253Delectronics%26field-keywords%3DCanon%2BEOS%2BDSLR%26x%3D14%26y%3D18&amp;tag=camera-accessory-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325" target="_blank">Canon EOS</a> 400D for Canon mount but the Canon version is not available yet so I use my friend camera, <a title="Nikon D300" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fs%3Furl%3Dsearch-alias%253Daps%26field-keywords%3Dnikon%2Bd300%26x%3D0%26y%3D0&amp;tag=camera-accessory-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325" target="_blank">Nikon D300</a>, instead.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://amzn.to/ntbtRB" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-346" title="tamron-17-50-f2_8-di_II_VC" src="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/uploads/2009/10/tamron-17-50-f2_8-di_II_VC1.jpg" alt="tamron-17-50-f2_8-di_II_VC" width="500" height="365" /></a></p>
<p>My reviewed points are listed below;</p>
<p><span id="more-300"></span></p>
<p><strong>Body:</strong> Its body is bigger and better lens body than old version, <strong><a href="http://amzn.to/o5GwzX" rel="nofollow">Tamron 17-50 F2.8</a> </strong>. When I use it, I feel that it is more robust and fit a little bit better with my hands.</p>
<p><strong>Focus Speed: </strong>The focus speed of <strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><a href="http://amzn.to/ntbtRB" rel="nofollow">Tamron 17-50 F2.8 VC</a> </span></strong>is faster than<strong><a href="http://amzn.to/o5GwzX" rel="nofollow">Tamron 17-50 F2.8</a> </strong> but it’s still slower than Ultra Sonic Motor (USM for Canon) or Silent Wave Motor (SWM for Nikon). Anyway, I am impressed with this improvement.</p>
<p><strong>Focus Sound: </strong>The non VC version, <strong><a href="http://amzn.to/o5GwzX" rel="nofollow">Tamron 17-50 F2.8</a></strong>, is so noisy; however, this version produces less noisy which is acceptable. If you compare its focus sound to Ultra Sonic Motor (USM for Canon) or Silent Wave Motor (SWM for Nikon) , it is still far away from the big names.</p>
<p><strong>Vibration Compensation (VC): </strong>The Vibration Compensation (VC) is the most interesting point that I would like to see how excellent it is. I tried several slow speed shots and I still got good images. You can see from the sample shot below that I am able to hand held and a take photo at 50 mm with shutter speed of ¼ sec and I still got a nice photo. It is almost impossible for me to hand held and take good quality photos with ¼ sec shutter speed. When VC is on, you will see a little bit shaking, similar to Image Stabilizer (IS) of Canon, in your view finder while focusing and taking photos so please do not panic because VC is working.</p>
<p><strong>Sharpness:</strong> At F2.8, this lens produces nice and acceptable sharp images. When you stopped down, this lens can create excellent image quality as you can see from the sample below. I capture detail at the middle of this photo.</p>
<p>Referring to a sample photo below with 100% zoom, at f 2.8 a photo is a little blur but over all image quality is good. When aperture is stopped down to F 4 onwards, the image quality is excellent. The image quality will decrease when aperture is very small (F22) but the overall is still very good.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-349" title="36mm-motorcycle" src="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/uploads/2009/10/36mm-motorcycle.jpg" alt="36mm-motorcycle" width="333" height="500" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-350" title="36-mm-photography" src="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/uploads/2009/10/36-mm-photography.jpg" alt="36-mm-photography" width="400" height="1300" /></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;">Note: All shots are hand held shooting.</span></p>
<p>Looking at the border of photo, the lens makes nice and sharp photo starting at f 2.8. Normally, when stopping down aperture (f 4 onwards), the lens create excellent sharpness at border.</p>
<p>Let’s see the sample for image sharpness at different aperture values.</p>
<p>1st point in the middle at17 mm</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-305" title="17-mm-center" src="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/uploads/2009/10/17-mm-center.jpg" alt="17-mm-center" width="500" height="333" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-307" title="17-mm-middle-comparision-p-" src="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/uploads/2009/10/17-mm-middle-comparision-p-1.jpg" alt="17-mm-middle-comparision-p-" width="399" height="1197" /></p>
<p>2 nd point</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-308" title="17-mm-between" src="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/uploads/2009/10/17-mm-between.jpg" alt="17-mm-between" width="500" height="333" /></p>
<p>Crop 100%</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-309" title="17-mm-between-p-photography" src="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/uploads/2009/10/17-mm-between-p-photography.jpg" alt="17-mm-between-p-photography" width="400" height="1193" /></p>
<p>3rd point</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-310" title="17-mm-border" src="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/uploads/2009/10/17-mm-border.jpg" alt="17-mm-border" width="500" height="333" /></p>
<p>Crop 100%</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-311" title="17-mm-far-comparision-p-pho" src="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/uploads/2009/10/17-mm-far-comparision-p-pho.jpg" alt="17-mm-far-comparision-p-pho" width="400" height="1195" /></p>
<p>I took many shots from 17 mm to 50 mm with various f-number you can down load full images as per links below. <span style="color: #ff0000;">Note: All shots are hand held shooting.</span></p>
<p><strong>Photos at 17 mm </strong>** Please remember that <span style="color: #ff0000;">all shots are hand held shooting therefore they are not 100% match of each photo. All photos are 12 MP JPG images so each photo is big size.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-313" title="KUN_1378" src="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/uploads/2009/10/KUN_1378.jpg" alt="KUN_1378" width="200" height="134" /></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1378.zip">Focal length = 17 mm, F 2.8, S = 1/400 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1379.zip">Focal length = 17 mm, F 4, S = 1/250 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1380.zip">Focal length = 17 mm, F 5.6, S = 1/125 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1381.zip">Focal length = 17 mm, F 8, S = 1/60 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1382.zip">Focal length = 17 mm, F 11, S = 1/30 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1383.zip">Focal length = 17 mm, F 16, S = 1/15 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1384.zip">Focal length = 17 mm, F 22, S = 1/8 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><strong>Photos at 34 mm</strong></p>
<p><strong><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-322" title="KUN_1387" src="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/uploads/2009/10/KUN_1387.jpg" alt="KUN_1387" width="200" height="134" /></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1385.zip">Focal length = 34 mm, F 2.8, S = 1/250 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1386.zip">Focal length = 34 mm, F 4, S = 1/160 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1387.zip">Focal length = 34 mm, F 5.6, S = 1/80 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1388.zip">Focal length = 34 mm, F 8, S = 1/40 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1389.zip">Focal length = 34 mm, F 11, S = 1/20 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1390.zip">Focal length = 34 mm, F 16, S = 1/10 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1391.zip">Focal length = 34 mm, F 22, S = 1/5 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><strong>Photos at 50 mm</strong></p>
<p><strong><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-331" title="KUN_1396" src="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/uploads/2009/10/KUN_1396.jpg" alt="KUN_1396" width="200" height="134" /></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1392.zip">Focal length = 50 mm, F 2.8, S = 1/250 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1393.zip">Focal length = 50 mm, F 4, S = 1/125 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1394.zip">Focal length = 50 mm, F 5.6, S = 1/60 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1395.zip">Focal length = 50 mm, F 8, S = 1/30 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1396.zip">Focal length = 50 mm, F 11, S = 1/15 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1397.zip">Focal length = 50 mm, F 16, S = 1/8 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1398.zip">Focal length = 50 mm, F 22, S = 1/4 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><strong>Motorcycle shot at 36 mm</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-336" title="KUN_1402" src="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/uploads/2009/10/KUN_1402.jpg" alt="KUN_1402" width="134" height="200" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1399.zip">Focal length = 36 mm, F 2.8, S = 1/640 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1400.zip">Focal length = 36 mm, F 4, S = 1/320 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1401.zip">Focal length = 36 mm, F 5.6, S = 1/160 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1402.zip">Focal length = 36 mm, F 8, S = 1/80 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1403.zip">Focal length = 36 mm, F 11, S = 1/40 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1404.zip">Focal length = 36 mm, F 16, S = 1/20 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/Tamron17-50vc_sample-photo/KUN_1405.zip">Focal length = 36 mm, F 22, S = 1/13 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</a></p>
<p><strong>Distortion: </strong>At 17 mm, barrel distortion is noticeable as you can see from sample shots. The barrel distortion reduces when long focal length is applied. There is slightly noticeable barrel at 24 mm. After a focal length of 24 mm, the barrel distortion is almost none.</p>
<p><strong>Price: ’</strong><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><a href="http://amzn.to/ntbtRB" rel="nofollow">Tamron 17-50 F2.8 VC</a>&#8216;</span></strong>s price is about 649$ (according to amazon.com) for both Nikon and Canon Mount which is 149 $ higher than the old version,<strong><a href="http://amzn.to/o5GwzX" rel="nofollow">Tamron 17-50 F2.8</a> </strong>.</p>
<p>In comparison to <a title="Nikorr 17-55 F2.8" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FNikon-17-55mm-2-8G-ED-IF-Nikkor%2Fdp%2FB000144I2Q%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Delectronics%26qid%3D1255671160%26sr%3D1-1-spell&amp;tag=camera-accessory-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325" target="_blank"><strong>Nikor 17-55 F 2.8</strong></a> (1330 $) in case of Nikon mount, it’s almost half price of Nikor lens. What’s more, looking at Canon Lens for the same focal range , <a title="Canon 17-55 F2.8 IS" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FCanon-EF-S-17-55mm-Lens-Cameras%2Fdp%2FB000EW8074%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dphoto%26qid%3D1255671150%26sr%3D1-1&amp;tag=camera-accessory-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325" target="_blank"><strong>Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens</strong></a> (1040 $), the Tamron is still 400 approximately cheaper.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although I did not much time for testing this lens, I think this lens is one of the good normal zoom lens for APS-C sensor camera. Therefore, before buying new normal lens or upgrading new lens for your digital camera, please consider this lens<strong>.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Where can you buy it at very cheap price?</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I recommend Amazon.com because you will be the best price on the internet and Amazon has good reputation of good delivery.</p>
<p><a href="http://amzn.to/ntbtRB" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-758" title="tamron-1750-vc" src="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/uploads/2009/10/tamron-1750-vc.gif" alt="" width="500" height="351" /></a></p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 6189px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">
<table style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 335pt;" width="446" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<colgroup>
<col style="width: 335pt;" width="446" /></colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr style="height: 14.25pt;">
<td style="height: 14.25pt; width: 335pt;" align="left" width="446" height="19">focal length = 17 mm, F 2.8, S = 1/400 sec, VC = On, Hand Held</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<h4>Incoming search terms:</h4><ul><li><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/" title="tamron 17-50 vc review">tamron 17-50 vc review</a></li><li><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/" title="tamron 17-50 vc">tamron 17-50 vc</a></li><li><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/" title="tamron 17-50">tamron 17-50</a></li><li><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/" title="tamron 17-50 vc test">tamron 17-50 vc test</a></li><li><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/" title="tamron 17-50 review">tamron 17-50 review</a></li><li><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/" title="17-50 vc">17-50 vc</a></li><li><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/" title="tamron 17-50 f2 8 vc">tamron 17-50 f2 8 vc</a></li><li><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/" title="tamron 17-50 recensione">tamron 17-50 recensione</a></li><li><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/" title="tamron 17 50 vc review">tamron 17 50 vc review</a></li><li><a href="http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/" title="Tamron 17-50 2 8 VC">Tamron 17-50 2 8 VC</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.photoshopphotography.com/tamron-17-50-vc-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.photoshopphotography.com @ 2012-02-07 11:33:23 -->
